Rituals

This clip shows me many things,  mainly about tribal cultures and how even though this isn't where our play is set, most tibes have simlar rituals as a part of their culture. Researching these rituals helps me to understand what they value as important and their traditions, helping me to learn more about their culture, as this is the world that we are trying to create on stage. Also as a Europian who wouldn't have seen this sort of rituals before it is interesting to look at and to think of my characters reaction to the difference in culture as to her this would seem animalistic and it would have been seen idiotic to harm oneself, however this is the world that she has entered so although she might look down on them, she might also feel scared and intimidated by them because of what they are capable of. Also it is interesting to look at the female roles in society and the contrasting opinions of wanting to impress them but also seeing the as infecious, this could effect the way that Caliban treats Stephana and Trincula, as they are beileved to infect and poisen men, this could create an internal tempest within him. Consequently this could effect the way that we treat him, maybe trying to push him or to test him and even though we are used to being lower status than men, trying to push or change this when realising his weaknesses.

Design Choices – Contextualisation

 

In our performance, as in all, the designs for the set and the costumes are of huge importance to our performance as they communicate a lot about our theme and the message of the piece that we are trying to get across to the audience. Throughout our set and our costume there is a common running theme of the British and the African culture being mixed together and intertwined. This shows in the set that the British are imposing their culture trying to colonise them with the British culture. It also shows how two opposing cultures have met and for some, especially those in the lost, it is about making the two cultures and worlds work together and to get along as best as they can. This is demonstrated mainly in our costumes, as the African costumes have small elements of British in them to show how the culture have intertwined and that the British are slowly taking over their native land.

 

Every element of our set says something about our theme even down to the rocks. The rocks show the world and natural environment that the play is set in. For the characters that have come off the boat, they have entered a world that is different to the world that they have left, in terms of culture, but also in terms of weather and heat. The rocks show that the country they have entered is a dry one, without a lot of water and the main natural element to it is the rocks and the lack of trees show that it is hard for plants to grow there, showing that it is a hot country. This is really important for the characters from the main land to understand and to take into account as they wouldn’t have been used to this amount of heat and lack of water, so it would have a huge affect on their physicality and the way that they move. Also it could affect them mentally as the heat and lack of water could make them delirious and start to hallucinate. However the rocks also hold a lot of symbolism in them, as with the lack of trees and the only thing able to survive on the land is non-living things, could show what the British have done to their country and their culture. It could suggest that the British have come in and stripped everything bright and colourful in their land and in their culture till all that is left are emotionless beings. It as the only things that are still around is dead natural element it could suggest that the British have been brutal with their take over of the country and that they killed everything that thrived in that land and culture so that they aren’t a threat to them.

 

Also on the set we have a shrine to Queen Vic, this not only gives some contextualisation to our piece of theatre and to our audience so that they can clearly understand the time that it is set in, but it also stands out in that world for a reason. Queen Victory isn’t someone who should or would have been associated with the natives culture, however by having it in there land, it shows that how the British and the British culture has imposed and forced itself on the natives culture and their world. It also acts as a way of claiming the land, like when the Americans landed on the moon they put an American flag on it, the shrine to Queen Vic gives a sense of claiming and ownership to the land, its as if they have arrived there and taken over the land and forced the natives to bow down to their monarch and consequently their culture.

 

Also all over the set, on the rocks, on Prospero’s house and on the shrine, there are aluminous, bright colours that glow in the dark. These are really important to the set and to the play as a whole as the represent Prospero’s power over all of the land. As in our version of the play Prospero is a witchdoctor and he is uses his drugs, which are paints, to control people and to keep him in power. By having the paints, showing the drugs, covering the set, it shows how he has manipulated the country so that he can stay in power and so that he can control everyone and everything around him. It shows how everyone is constantly drugged so that he can dictate over them.

 

SHAKESPEARES WORLD – HISTORY AND SOCIETY

At the end of Henry 8^th reign it can be considered as the transition into the new modern world. As this is the time that when the New World – America was discovered, printing came about, Protestant became the more prominent religion in Britain with the monarch being the head of the church and a new class was created in society – the middle class, with more people being educated. This created the Renaissance or enlightenment era, an era of creativity, from Greece, with the philosophy of life being questioned.

Henry 8^th changed a previously Catholic society into a Protestant one. The main trigger for the change was that he wanted to divorce his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, however the pope would not allow this divorce so as a way of achieving it Henry changed to a Protestant and the country changing to Protestant as well, and along side that made the monarch, himself, the head of the Protestant church in England. Although Britain was originally a Catholic country some people wanted to end the hegemony and the rules of Catholicism. Henry also saw this as an opportunity to move some of the wealth from the Catholic Church into the country.

After Henry’s death there was four monarchs in the space of eleven years: Edward 6^th who was ten years old, so he had a lot of people to run the country for him and ran it as a Protestant country, he died in 1553. After he died, Lady Jane Grey came in as the next monarch, although not next in line to the throne, Jane was a Protestant and when Edward became ill precautions were put in place to make Jane the next Queen as Mary was a Catholic and they didn’t want the country to go back to Catholicism. However Lady Jane Grey was only Queen for seven days and then was beheaded by Mary’s men and Mary came into power and her reign began as Queen Mary or Bloody Mary. In Mary’s reign the country was turned back to a Catholic country and in her reign there was a lot of murder and she got quite bad a reputation, for example she had 300 heretics burnt at the stake. After Mary died, her younger sister Elizabeth came into power, although she reverted the country back to a Protestant state, out of all the monarch’s over the last few years she tried to keep the peace the most. Elizabeth also started the secrete service. Throughout these eleven years the constant shift in religious power created a sense of instability in the country and danger and death was felt around the country and the countries peoples.

This is really important that we understand the state of the country that Shakespeare was born into and when he was writing, as that would influence his plays that he would put on. In our society now there isn’t censorship on the media so in contemporary theatre, playwrights have freedom to write and produce plays with whatever content in them, and able to say whatever they want. However when Shakespeare was writing he had to be very careful with what he put into his plays as if he offended the monarch or showed himself against the religious aspects of the country at that point in time, he would be arrested or in those times even killed. This meant that when he was writing he had to be very aware socially of what was going at the time as he wouldn’t want to put his own life at risk. Also for Shakespeare this was a way of making money and he would have had to write plays that would please the audiences and would pull in large audiences to the theatres so that he would make money and be able to live and feed his family.

NEW WORLDS

Even though when the British went to the new worlds there was many benefits for them as they got new foods, medicines and cultures, they often didn’t understand the natives of the country they had found and this is shown in Shakespeare’s naming of what one could call the Noble Savage: Caliban (although some may argue that Ariel is more of a Noble Savage, especially in our performance of The Tempest.) Caliban sounds like cannibal that comes from Carrien or Caribbean. This shows how the British thought that those from the Caribbean and most likely those from African or Indian countries were cannibals. This came from the British not understanding their culture and not knowing or seeing them as people but as animals, as they thought them uncivilised, because they know nothing of or understood their world or ways of life. This was so thought that a book in 1603 was written called “Of Cannibals” by Montaignt, this shows how it was widely accepted and normal in the society that they lived in. Also the timing of the book being written and published links in to the writing of The Tempest, suggesting that Shakespeare could have got some of his influences from it. This is supported by Gonzalo’s speech in Act 2, Scene 1, which is of great similarity to a passage of writing in the book. This is of Gonzalo speaking about a utopia that he wants to find and to live in, where there is no private state or labour but equality for everyone. This is very interesting as to the characterisation of Gonzalo as his opinions are political and sociological opinions that have been around though out the years and are still relevant today. This allows us to contextualise the play and the characters in a political way as we see Gonzalo present a more liberal political view, where as it could be argued that Prospero shows an extremist right wing political opinion and could be seen as a dictator over the island. This could have contextualise the play in a political point of view as the conflicts in the political world are constant throughout history and as Shakespeare and most writers write in reaction to their society at the time, it could show how he is writing about the politics of the time, which is still relevant in our society and to our audiences today.

Thought this was too good not to be on my blog :) .... but on a more educational note:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYfM0RFZ5cs

 (sorry it wouldn't load as a video)

 

 

My Character Based On A Real Person

The real person I found that I am going to base my character on is Sarah Bishop, although she has had fiction based on her, I am only looking at the real facts about her. Sarah Bishop, from New York, was a victim of a British raiding party in I778. She got taken aboard a British privateer; she became a member of the crew with certain additional duties. Although she handled the wheel and stood watches, she was also expected to be a communal sex object, rape was a common occurrence in war times and on ships it wasn’t seen or considered wrong as the men had to have their pleasure some how. Over time Sarah and the captain of the privateer came to an understanding, after which she was strictly the captain's woman. However the captain was killed in an engagement with an American privateer, and it was another six months before Bishop found an opportunity to escape. It took two whole years after she was first captured to escape and Sarah Bishop slipped over the side of the ship and swam ashore at Stamford, Connecticut. Her experience had been so traumatic that she could not bear to return to normal human society. She made her way to Ridgefield, Connecticut, and climbed to a rocky cave, where she lived the rest of her life as a hermit. Bishop had become a seagoing prostitute against her will.

Later accounts say Bishop was forced to serve the crew aboard a British privateer. Some websites list her among female pirates. Some interpreted this account more realistically to present Bishop as a victim of rape and, possibly, post-traumatic stress syndrome

 

In 1839, the New England Gazetteer reported:

“She lived on Long Island at the time of the Revolutionary war. Her father’s house was burned by the British, and she was cruelly treated by a British officer. She then left society and wandered among the mountains near this part of the state: she found a kind of cave near Ridgefield, where she resided till about the time of her death, which took place in 1810.”

The Democrat of Boston published an essay about Bishop, “The Hermitess of North Salem,” on 22 Sept 1804, crediting a Poughkeepsie newspaper as the source. That article suggested a different history for her reclusiveness:

“Sarah Bishop, (for this was the name of this Hermitess) is a person of about fifty years of age. About thirty years ago [i.e., 1774] she was a young lady of considerable beauty, a competent share of mental endowments, and education; She was possessed of a handsome fortune, but she was of a tender of delicate constitution, and enjoyed but a low degree of health; and could hardly be comfortable without constant recourse to medicine, and careful attendance; and added to this, she always discovered an unusual antipathy to men; and was often heard to say that she had no dread of any animal on earth but man. Disgusted with them, and consequently with the world, about twenty-three years ago [i.e., about 1781], she withdrew herself from all human society...”

GLOBE

When Charles become King he brought back theatre to Britain as in his life he spent time in France which as a country is huge on theatre. Also with his reign he introduced women being a part of the theatre as actors as well as men. Previous to this acting had been an all male industry, with teenage boys playing the female roles before their voice broke. After Shakespearian theatre came Restoration theatre which was even wordier and was basically a selection of elegant, eloquent insults.

At the time Shakespeare was writing the focus in theatre was on the language being said rather than the physical action, because of this the actors had no rehearsal time and only had one read through the day before the performance, they learnt their lines for the show and then performed without any direction. This being the norm, in Shakespeare’s writing there is some stage directions but also in the language of the line for the characters. This gave the actors some direction of what to do on stage and also what Shakespeare intended for the performance. For us now performing Shakespeare it is really interesting to notice these indications left by Shakespeare as it shows us elements of our character such as how they would react in a certain situation by indicating whether they would move away from a scary or intimidating situation or stay strong.

Traditionally Shakespearian theatre is formed of a basic reading of the language. As they don’t have rehearsal time they didn’t contextualise the language as we are doing now with our piece as we link it to the African theme and what could be meant or message being said by Shakespeare in the language. As a result of this thee performance had very little meaning than that of what Shakespeare meant by it, unlike us where we have a director and company to put another tone on top of the piece, in Shakespearian times the performances would simply about the words and the message of the words not a deeper or underlining message. As well as this traditionally when performed in Shakespearian times the lines would be declaimed when they were spoken. A line could be thrown away very easily in a scene. Consequently the lines would have very little emotional attachment or objective connected to them, this would make the performances full of stereotypes as the actors didn’t look deeper into the characters. Also because of the lack of emotional attachment to the line and as theatre at the time was focused on the language the body was very detached from the words and action that was taking place on stage.

When we saw the performance at the Globe one thing that we noticed was the decoration on the stage and the building as a whole. There was paintings of the Zodiac sign, which represents the world, this is important as it shows how the theatre takes in everything about the world and all aspects of the world can link into theatre. The top of the building with the open roof represents the heavens being above, making hell below. This was also mimicked by the seating arrangements of the audience as the higher in class you were the higher in the audience you would sit with the peasants being the groundlings who only paid one penny and had to stand, it was believed then that the higher class you were, the more money you had the closer to God you were as he had given you that wealth, this links to the idea that the theatre is set our as a world with heaven and hell watching it. This was also highlighted by the two trap doors that are on the stage which also can indicate to the characterisation of certain characters. One of the trap doors represents heaven while the over comes up from the bottom showing hell. Shakespeare would use these to his advantage and if a character came up from the bottom trap door it tells the audience that this is a dark character that is devilish. To support this other actors would make the sound effects as a character came up from the hell trap door as they would make the sound of hounds crying and crows, this played on the audiences superstitions and made the character even more frightening to the audience. This helps us as actors now as we can look into the language used by Shakespeare and his given stage direction as it tells us if our character has a certain superstitious quality to them or if they are a hero and close to God or the opposite. Other than these trap doors there was no elaborate set or scenery and the lighting would come from the natural light from the outside as performances would take place in the afternoon or later on they got lighting from burning limestone. Because of the lack of scenery the actors and writers also relied on the audience by asking them to use their imaginations in create the set, for example in Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet Shakespeare writes into the line that it is dark, allowing the audience to create the world of the play in their minds. This is really interesting to us actors as it shows us what was expected to of the audience in that time and when comparing this to theatre now and how we could use the language to get the audiences attention like they used to and to engage them as Shakespeare expected them to be engaged.

However they would have costumes to use in the performances and were hugely important as other than the writing they were the only thing other than the words that they had to set the scene for the audience. The costumes were often donated by patrons of the theatre and consequently they could be really expensive clothing of high status people. The language and the costume was what was used mainly in Shakespearian times to set the scene, the time and the place, so they played a huge part in the performance.

At the back of the Globe stage are two doors leading to backstage or as it was called the tiring house, where they would change costume, with the stage wall being covered by a curtain. Above the stage wall is a gallery which has the musician in it. This shows the importance of music in Shakespeare’s plays. Also in the gallery, really rich people would pay to sit there, even though they had a bad view. This was because going to the theatre for the rich was about showing off their wealth and a socialising event rather than watching the performance. By sitting in the gallery those who sat there would have all the other audience members watching them and they would peacock to show off their power and wealth. On the stage there were also two pillars that are made of tree trunks, these hold up the roof and the heavens. Behind them there was the frounts scenan.

The role of the audience has changed massively over time as now they sit quietly and rarely respond vocally or physically to the performance, in Shakespearian times the audience were heavily involved in the performance. Often the audience’s would be very drunk especially the groundlings and this meant that they were very rowdy and loud. During the performance they could talk, joke, and throw things if they weren’t enjoying the performance but also they listened to the words of what was being said as this was what was important to them in the theatre. However the main thing about the audience to know is that they were uncontrollable and interacted with the actors largely with lines being said directly to them. This is really interesting for us to know as this is something that our audience will not be used to that and as we are trying to get this in our performance we have to understand that the audience may not be used to it but I think we need to be able to bring in these lines and to use them in a really effective way that won’t make them look or sound cheesy. It shows us how there was no separation between the audience and the actors, unlike Checkov the audience weren’t to be made to believe that we were in a different world to them but that they are with the actors.

How do we contextualise the performance compared to Shakespeare:  

Difference	Similarities
Sound effects	Costume
Lighting	Thrust stage
Set	Voice projection
Style of Acting – unification of emotion, gesture and word to make a character	Brighton – natural lighting
Story set on interaction no words	Two scenes at once
Amount of rehearsal time	Using music
Director	Song in curtain call
Contextualise – put theme on	Interact with audience
Abridged version

 

 

Measurements of the Globe:

Height – 5 feet

Width – 45 feet

Length – 30 feet

People – 600 in the pit and 900 seated

CONTEXTUALISATION - MODERN AUDEINCE

Our version of The Tempest is set at the begging of the end of slavery, around the 18^Th and 19^th century, and one of the issues that we need to consider is how we were going to make it relevant to a modern audience especially as it is written is Shakespearian language. We thought that it could be quite easy for our audience to be alienated by the fact that it hasn’t got a modern or timeless setting as they may feel like it doesn’t relate to them or that our message is simply commenting on the past and not saying anything about our society now. However I think it is important to remember that the end of slavery wasn’t that long ago and still relevant in modern history as relations between different races are still a prominent part of our modern society. So I think that our message about Colonialism and slavery is still relevant to the suppression that conceits in our society and recent society.

One thing that makes our concept and performance so relevant to a modern audience is that it confronts their morals and challenges they way that they think. Although slavery wouldn’t be something that our audience may have been directly involved or linked with however it challenges their history and the country that they are a part of. It challenges the political and historical structure of our society. It challenges the outlook that we have on our history, as a country England has always been one of pride and traditionally the I think we have always found it hard to accept or admit or wrongs as we have so often been at the worlds powers, in our performance I think, with the use of hindsight, we confront our audiences morals by making them question our counties past and choices that were made on behalf of our nationality. It does this by offering a perspective on the past and questioning what we did as a country and how it affected those around us.

It also makes a cultural comment as in our version some of the characters, such as Caliban are based on real people. This makes our version more connected to the cultural aspect that we are exploring as it looks into real people, how they were affected by the true events that we are exploring. This could make our audience; even though they are modern, more connected to our piece of theatre as it has a raw realness to it making the characters even more believable and connectable.

Shakespeares Inspiration

One of the most common theories of what inspired Shakespeare to write The Tempest is a real shipwreck that happened in 1609 in the Bahamas. The Sea Venture was a main ship that was made for powerful Virginia Company, left port in June carrying settlers to Jamestown in Virginia. About two months into the trip, the ship was caught in a real life tempest, a hurricane that lead the Captain to ground the ship on reefs of an island, because of this crash in Bermuda 150 people and a dog were saved but many thought they were lost at sea. Although in after the crash many of the British struggled to adapt to survive in this new country and as a way of survival they asked the natives for help and once they had grown accustomed to the new world they lived in and became stronger they killed the natives who had once helped them and claimed their land, this is a start to colonialism. Some of those shipwrecked lived on the island for 10 months and within that time built two boats to journey back on. From this experience a new country was discovered and colonialism began.

Back in London the shipwreck and the following events were published in a pamphlet by William Strachey, an eye witness. It is now believed that Shakespeare used these tales of the storm and shipwreck as well as his imagination to create The Tempest with elements of the storm and reports from Jamestown and English colony at Roanake.  The Tempest was first performed in 1611 making the timing of the play match up to the real event.


For a contemporary performance of The Tempest it is important to know the background and inspiration for The Tempest as we can find parallels for it in the modern world. For example we can link the colonisation for new lands and worlds to the discovery in science and space, such as the race between Russia and America to put a man on the moon. This discovery of new worlds and wanted to own and claim them as one owns. This gives contemporary audiences a universal understanding as there is a common link in humanity and people in societies to want to show off their power by claiming new worlds that is still relevant to us today.

Set Design

The Globe Space

I think it was really interesting and helpful to look at the Globe stage and to watch people perform on it for many reasons.
I thought it really put performance into context for me as it showed me what space actors in Shakespearian had to perform in and how they would have conducted themselves to make sure that they always were connecting and including with the surrounding audience. One thing a noticed about the actors is that they seemed to have a constant energy within them, I thought that this was good because they used this energy to make sure that every person in the audience was included in the performance. They did this through their movement and command of the stage, although I thought they didn't always get the balance right in controlling their energy as at some points it felt as if they were just running around for no reason. However I do think that they used the stage well and were able to address all members and areas of the audience and personally I think that this is really important because it means that all of the audience gets to enjoy the performance and to connect with the characters as they are able to see them and to be able to be emotionally part of the performance. I think this was really useful to watch as it shows me as an actor who is working in a thrust stage like the Globe is, how to be able to do a performance that includes all the audience but without looking forced or unnatural. I think on of the issues I personally face when it comes to performing in the Thrust is trying to give an honest and truthful performance, allowing my character to move naturally but at the same time opening the performance up to all sides of the audiences, so I think that watching another performance in a Thrust stage was really useful to experience it as an audience member to understand what I want from the actors to make me feel engaged.
I also think that contextually it was really interesting to watch a performance at the Globe because it showed us how it would have been performed in regard to the spacing that the performance took place in it. This allowed me to understand what Shakespeare was writing for and how he would have visualised his performance when he was writing as it would be performed in that space. This could show us how he may have written certain characters or their characteristics for the performance space, for example the more comical characters may have been given certain lines or characteristic's that would connect with the audience because they are so close to them, this could be argued that it gives us an insight to the characters and how they may be performed.

Globe Stage